Seminars in Colon & Rectal Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 48-52 , March 2008

Outcomes after Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Surgery

  • Amir A. Ghaferi, MD
    • ,
  • Emily Finlayson, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Emily Finlayson, MD, MS, University of Michigan, Department of Surgery, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

References 

  1. Jacobs M, Vereja J, Goldstein H. Minimally invasive colon resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1:144–150
  2. Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mattar SG, et al. Laparoscopic vs open resection for the treatment of diverticular disease. Surg Endosc. 2003;18:276–280
  3. Noel JK, Fahrbach K, Estok R, et al. Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short-term comparison with open procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:291-207
  4. Thaler K, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Arnaud JP, Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R. Recurrence rates at minimum 5-year follow-up: laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003;13:325–327
  5. Young-Fadok TM, Long KH, McConnell EJ, Rey GG, Cabanela RL. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:450–454
  6. Shore G, Gonzalez QH, Bondora A, Vickers SM. laparoscopic vs conventional ileocolectomy for primary Crohn disease. Arch Surg. 2003;138:76–79
  7. Milsom JW, Hammerhoffer KA, Bohm B, Marcello PW, Fazio VW, Elson P. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1–9
  8. Rosman AS, Melis M, Fichera A. Metaanalysis of trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1549–1555
  9. Hildebrandt U, Lindemann W, Kreissler-Haag D, Feifel G, Ecker KW. [Laparoscopically-assisted proctocolectomy with ileoanal pouch in ulcerative colitis]. Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123:403–405
  10. Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK, et al. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:604–608
  11. Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, vanDuijvejijk P, Gouma DJ. Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1800–1806
  12. Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142:298–303
  13. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–2059
  14. Milsom J, Bohm B, Hammerhofer K, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P. A prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:46–57
  15. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg. 2002;236:759–767
  16. Lacy A, Garcia-Valdecasas J, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224–2229
  17. Leung K, Kwok S, Lam S, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1187–1192

PII: S1043-1489(08)00011-0

doi: 10.1053/j.scrs.2008.01.010

Seminars in Colon & Rectal Surgery
Volume 19, Issue 1 , Pages 48-52 , March 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution