Seminars in Colon & Rectal Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 88-92 , June 2009

Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis: Meta-Analysis and Comparison of Outcomes Between Techniques

  • A.G. Heriot, MD, FRCS, FRACS

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: A.G. Heriot, MD, FRCS, FRACS, Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 1 St. Andrew's Place, Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia
    • ,
  • A.C. Lynch, MMedSci, FRACS

References 

  1. Parks A, Nicholls R. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. BMJ. 1978;2:85–88
  2. Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M, et al. Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1980;23:459–466
  3. Nicholls R, Pezim M. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: A comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg. 1985;72:470–474
  4. Nicholls R. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir: Indications and results. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1990;120:485–488
  5. Kmiot W, Keighley M. Total stapled abdominal restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 1989;76:961–964
  6. Clarke M, Horton R. Bringing it all together: Lancet-Cochrane collaborate on systematic reviews. Lancet. 2001;357:1728
  7. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–748
  8. Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–634
  9. Athanasiou T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P, et al. Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:745–753
  10. Lovegrove R, Constantinides V, Heriot A, et al. A comparison of handsewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy—A meta-analysis of 4045 patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244:18–26
  11. Lovegrove R, Heriot A, Constantinides V, et al. A comparison of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W, and S ileal pouch reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:310–320
  12. Regimbeau J, Panis Y, Pocard M, et al. Handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on the dentate line after total proctectomy: Technique to avoid incomplete mucosectomy and the need for long-term follow-up of the anal transition zone. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:43–50
  13. Miller R, Lewis G, Bartolo D, et al. Sensory discrimination and dynamic activity in the anorectum: Evidence using a new ambulatory technique. Br J Surg. 1988;75:1003–1007
  14. Saigusa N, Kurahashi T, Nakamura T, et al. Functional outcome of stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis versus handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis. Surg Today. 2000;30:575–581
  15. Keighley M, Yoshioka K, Kmiot W. Prospective randomized trial to compare the stapled double lumen pouch and the sutured quadruple pouch for restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 1988;75:1008–1011
  16. Choen S, Tsunoda A, Nicholls R. Prospective randomized trial comparing anal function after hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis with mucosectomy versus stapled ileoanal anastomosis without mucosectomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 1991;78:430–434
  17. Cohen Z, McLeod R, Stephen W, et al. Continuing evolution of the pelvic pouch procedure. Ann Surg. 1992;216:506–511
  18. Luukkonen P, Jarvinen H. Stapled vs hand-sutured ileoanal anastomosis in restorative proctocolectomy (A prospective, randomized study). Arch Surg. 1993;128:437–440
  19. Wettergren A, Gyrtrup H, Grosmann E, et al. Complications after J-pouch ileoanal anastomosis: Stapled compared with handsewn anastomosis. Eur J Surg. 1993;159:121–124
  20. Gozzetti G, Poggioli G, Marchetti F, et al. Functional outcome in handsewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg. 1994;168:325–329
  21. McIntyre P, Pemberton J, Beart R, et al. Double-stapled vs. handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:430–433
  22. Sugerman H, Newsome H. Stapled ileoanal anastomosis without a temporary ileostomy. Am J Surg. 1994;167:58–65
  23. Hallgren T, Fasth S, Oresland T, et al. Ileal pouch anal function after endoanal mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis compared with stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy. Eur J Surg. 1995;161:915–921
  24. Pricolo V, Potenti F, Luks F. Selective preservation of the anal transition zone in ileoanal pouch procedures. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:871–877
  25. Ziv Y, Fazio V, Church J, et al. Stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses are safer than handsewn anastomoses in patients with ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg. 1996;171:320–323
  26. Reilly W, Pemberton J, Wolff B, et al. Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa. Ann Surg. 1997;225:666–676
  27. Araki Y, Isomoto H, Tsuzi Y, et al. Functional outcome of double-stapled and transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after proctocolectomy. Kurume Med J. 1998;45:209–213
  28. Scotte M, del Gallo G, Steinmetz L, et al. Ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: Results of an evolutionary surgical procedure. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45:2123–2126
  29. Fukushima T, Sugita A, Koganei K, et al. The incidence and outcome of pelvic sepsis following handsewn and stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses. Surg Today. 2000;30:223–227
  30. Gecim I, Wolff B, Pemberton J, et al. Does technique of anastomosis play any role in developing late perianal abscess or fistula?. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1241–1245
  31. Remzi F, Church J, Bast J, et al. Mucosectomy vs. stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with famila adenomatous polyposis: Functional outcome and neoplasia control. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1590–1596
  32. Rossi H, Brand M, Saclarides T. Anal complications after restorative proctocolectomy (J-pouch). Am Surg. 2002;68:628–630
  33. Kayaalp C, Nessar G, Akoglu M, et al. Elimination of mucosectomy during restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis may provide better results in low-volume centres. Am J Surg. 2003;185:268–272
  34. MacRae H, McLeod R, Cohen Z, et al. Risk factors for pelvic pouch failure. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:257–262
  35. Tulchinsky H, Hawley PR, Nicholls J. Long-term failure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 2003;238:229–234
  36. Tekkis P, Lovegrove R, Tilney H, et al. Long-term failure and function after restorative proctocolectomy—A multi-centre study of patients from the UK National Ileal Pouch Registry. Colorectal Dis. 2009;[Epub ahead of print]
  37. Tuckson W, Lavery IC, Fazio V, et al. Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg. 1991;161:90–95
  38. Hallgren T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, et al. The stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (A randomized study comparing two different pouch designs). Scand J Gastroenterol. 1990;25:1161–1168
  39. Oresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of two different pelvic pouch designs. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1990;25:986–996
  40. de Silva H, de Angelis C, Soper N, et al. Clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 1991;78:1039–1044
  41. Sagar P, Holdsworth P, Godwin P, et al. Comparison of triplicated (S) and quadruplicated (W) pelvic ileal reservoirs (Studies on manovolumetry, fecal bacteriology, fecal volatile fatty acids, mucosal morphology, and functional results). Gastroenterology. 1992;102:520–528
  42. Johnston D, Williamson M, Lewis W, et al. Prospective controlled trial of duplicated (J) versus quadruplicated (W) pelvic ileal reservoirs in restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1996;39:242–247
  43. Korsgen S, Keighley M. Causes of failure and life expectancy of the ileoanal pouch. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12:4–8
  44. Selvaggi F, Giuliani A, Gallo C, et al. Randomized, controlled trial to compare the J-pouch and W-pouch configurations for ulcerative colitis in the maturation period. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:615–620
  45. Nasmyth D, Williams N, Johnston D. Comparison of the function of triplicated and duplicated pelvic ileal reservoir after mucosal proctectomy and ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 1986;73:361–366
  46. Schoetz DJ, Coller J, Veidenheimer M. Ileoanal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. Arch Surg. 1986;121:404–409
  47. McHugh S, Diamant N, McLeod R, et al. S-pouches vs. J-pouches (A comparison of functional outcomes). Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30:671–677
  48. McMullen K, Hicks T, Ray J, et al. Complications associated with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg. 1991;15:763–766
  49. Harms B, Anderson A, Starlings J. The W ileal reservoir: Long-term assessment after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. Surgery. 1992;112:638–646
  50. Gemlo B, Belmonte C, Wiltz O, et al. Functional assessment of ileal pouch-anal anastomotic techniques. Am J Surg. 1995;169:137–141
  51. Hewett P, Stitz R, Hewett M. Harry E Bacon oration (Comparison of the functional results of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis between the J and W configuration ileal pouches with sutured ileoanal anastomosis). Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:567–572
  52. Romanos J, Samarasekera D, Stebbing J, et al. Outcome of 200 restorative proctocolectomy operations: The John Radcliffe Hospital experience. Br J Surg. 1997;84:814–818
  53. Neilly P, Neill M, Hill G. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 203 patients: The Auckland experience. Aust NZ J Surg. 1999;69:22–27
  54. Pescatori M. A modified three-loop ileoanal reservoir. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:823–824
  55. Fazio V, O'Riordain M, Lavery I, et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 1999;230:575–584
  56. Ko C, Rusin L, Schoetz DJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis: The association of bowel function and quality of life 5 years after surgery. J Surg Res. 2001;98:102–107

PII: S1043-1489(09)00012-8

doi: 10.1053/j.scrs.2009.05.008

Seminars in Colon & Rectal Surgery
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 88-92 , June 2009

Article Tools